One of the challenges of working with Javascript and libxml is that they use different encodings for strings. Javascript uses UTF-16/UCS-2, while libxml uses UTF-8. This means that we have to convert the strings every time we call a function from libxml.

To avoid this overhead, this library offers two types of parsing functions: String API and Buffer API. The String API takes a Javascript string as input and converts it to a UTF-8 buffer before parsing. The Buffer API takes a UTF-8 buffer as input and parses it directly. The Buffer API is faster than the String API, especially for large XML documents. Therefore, we recommend using the Buffer API whenever possible to improve the performance of your code.

The benchmark report below is for the performance of DOM tree parsing, among the following libraries

To run the benchmark, build the lib first,

npm ci && npm run build

Then run test in benchmark directory,

cd benchmark && npm ci
npm test
Environment: NodeJs v18.19.0 on Darwin arm64 Apple M3 Max

Running "fixtures/small.xml: 780 bytes" suite...
Progress: 100%

libxml2-wasm:
120 578 ops/s, ±0.12% | 28% slower

libxml2-wasm(buffer api):
167 479 ops/s, ±0.37% | fastest

libxmljs2:
78 688 ops/s, ±1.05% | 53.02% slower

@rgrove/parse-xml:
78 790 ops/s, ±0.19% | 52.96% slower

fast-xml-parser:
52 077 ops/s, ±0.27% | 68.91% slower

xmldoc:
41 125 ops/s, ±0.42% | slowest, 75.44% slower

Running "fixtures/medium.xml: 35562 bytes" suite...
Progress: 100%

libxml2-wasm:
6 013 ops/s, ±0.10% | 64.87% slower

libxml2-wasm(buffer api):
17 114 ops/s, ±0.14% | fastest

libxmljs2:
12 414 ops/s, ±1.82% | 27.46% slower

@rgrove/parse-xml:
5 049 ops/s, ±0.20% | 70.5% slower

fast-xml-parser:
2 708 ops/s, ±0.46% | 84.18% slower

xmldoc:
1 912 ops/s, ±0.41% | slowest, 88.83% slower

Running "fixtures/large.xml: 2337522 bytes" suite...
Progress: 100%

libxml2-wasm:
43 ops/s, ±0.11% | 30.65% slower

libxml2-wasm(buffer api):
62 ops/s, ±0.27% | fastest

libxmljs2:
50 ops/s, ±1.41% | 19.35% slower

@rgrove/parse-xml:
19 ops/s, ±0.93% | 69.35% slower

fast-xml-parser:
16 ops/s, ±0.37% | 74.19% slower

xmldoc:
11 ops/s, ±1.13% | slowest, 82.26% slower